## Problems

### practice

- Work along with this example using the worksheet energy-in-collisions-1.pdf.

The diagrams below represent generic objects before a collision followed by a set of outcomes to be considered. Comment on the outcomes, paying attention to the energy and momentum before and after each collision. Does the outcome describe a completely inelastic, partially inelastic, completely elastic, or impossible collision? Provide a brief explanation to accompany each answer. - Follow along with this activity using the worksheet bowling-balls.pdf.
- A 5 kg bowling ball moving at 8 m/s approaches a row of stationary balls lined up end to end in a ball return. Comment on the likelihood of the following outcomes.
- The incoming ball stops and one 5 kg ball leaves the row of stationary balls at a speed of 8 m/s.
- The incoming ball stops and two 5 kg balls leave the row of stationary balls at a speed of 4 m/s.

- Two 5 kg bowling balls moving at 8 m/s approach a row of stationary balls lined up end to end in a ball return. Comment on the likelihood of the following outcomes.
- The incoming balls stop and two 5 kg balls leave the row of stationary balls at a speed of 8 m/s.
- The incoming balls stop and one 5 kg ball leaves the row of stationary balls at a speed of 16 m/s.

- A 5 kg bowling ball moving at 8 m/s approaches a row of stationary balls lined up end to end in a ball return. Comment on the likelihood of the following outcomes.
- This is a gruesome question about the effectiveness of handguns when used for their intended purpose. A 1.10 kg pistol fires a 10.1 g bullet with a muzzle velocity of 375 m/s. Determine…
- the kinetic energy of the bullet
- the recoil velocity of the pistol
- the kinetic energy of the pistol
- the fraction of the total energy delivered to the bullet

- the velocity of the man and bullet together
- the kinetic energy of the man and bullet together
- the fraction of the total kinetic energy lost in the collision

- Two objects (
*m*_{1}and*m*_{2}) traveling in opposite directions (+*v*_{1}and −*v*_{2}) collide head on and stick together. Derive an expression for…- the final velocity of the two objects stuck together (easy)
- the kinetic energy lost as a result of the collision (hard)

### numerical

- .30 '06 Springfield and

.223 Remington cartridgesThe US Army was the first to equip its infantry with semi-automatic or self-loading rifles. From World War II to the Korean War, the standard issue rifle was the M1 Garand, which had a traditional looking soft, sculpted wooden stock. The standard issue rifle from the Vietnam War to the present has been the M16 — a modern looking hard, angular, weapon with lightweight plastic and aluminum components. Both rifles had barrels made of heavy steel. (That's something that will probably never change.) The heavy M1 was loaded with big, heavy .30 '06 (thirty ought six) cartridges. The lighter M16 uses smaller, lighter .223s (two twenty threes). Both shoot bullets at more than twice the speed of sound, the M16's being a little bit faster.- Complete the table below.
- Given the values in the table, what practical advantages does the M16 have over the M1 Garand?
- The M16 is purported to be more lethal than the M1 Garand. Do your calculations agree with this statement?

M1 Garand M16 years of

service1936–1957 1964–Present mass 4.4 kg

(9.6 lb.)3.8 kg

(7.5 lb.)barrel

length610 mm

(24 in.)510 mm

(20 in.)caliber 7.62 x 51 mm

(.30 '06 Springfield)5.56 x 45 mm

(.223 Remington)bullet

mass9.7 gram

(150 grain)3.9 gram

(61 grain)muzzle

velocity890 m/s

(2900 fps)950 m/s

(3100 fps)bullet

energybullet

momentumrecoil

velocity - Scientists at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York in conjunction with Brooklyn Union Gas (now a division of Keyspan Energy) are developing a compressed helium projectile launcher called the RAPTOR (short for "rapid cutter of concrete"). The original technology behind the gas gun began in the 1980s as part of an anti-missile research program. Now instead of shooting down missiles in midair, the RAPTOR will be used to shoot tiny metal projectiles at the ground to cut concrete like a jackhammer. The device works by rapidly compressing helium gas from its storage tank pressure of 2 atmospheres to an unbelievable 1000 atmospheres in a fraction of a second. The resulting shock wave blasts the 1.8 g projectiles (about the same mass as a .22 caliber bullet) out the barrel of the gun at roughly 1600 m/s (more than twice the muzzle velocity of a high-powered rifle). The main benefit of this technology is that it is much quieter than conventional concrete cutters —
85 dB for the RAPTOR compared to 125 dB for a jackhammer. The last reported prototype (RAPTOR III) was 2.0 m long, weighed 120 kg, and was able to split a 10 cm thick slab in seven shots. Determine…
- the work done by the compressed helium on a projectile
- the average force of the compressed helium on a projectile
- the impulse delivered to a projectile
- the time a projectile spends in the barrel,
- the recoil speed of the gun
- the height to which the gun would jump
- the minimum energy needed to split the concrete slab

### algebraic

- Show that when a moving object collides elastically with an identical stationary object, the two velocities after collision will be perpendicular to one another.

### worksheets

- energy-in-collisions-2.pdf

The diagrams below represent generic objects before a collision followed by a set of outcomes to be considered. Comment on the outcomes, paying attention to the energy and momentum before and after each collision. Does the outcome describe a completely inelastic, partially inelastic, completely elastic, or impossible collision? Provide a brief explanation to accompany each answer. (Note: in order to conserve space, the masses and velocities were not drawn to scale.)

### calculus

- Prove that a "perfectly inelastic" collision occurs when two objects stick together. That is, show that two colliding objects obeying the law of conservation of momentum have a minimum total kinetic energy when they move with the same velocity.